Difference between revisions of "Technology classification"

From E-Consultation Guide
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(17 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
<div style="padding-left:10px; float:right;">__TOC__</div>
 
Each consultation is different. There are many patterns of consultation. An annual survey of the needs of people in a local authority area is different from a consultation on how to dispose of nuclear waste. However, it is possible to identify tasks that are carried out in many consultations, tasks that combined together can form any given consultation process.
 
Each consultation is different. There are many patterns of consultation. An annual survey of the needs of people in a local authority area is different from a consultation on how to dispose of nuclear waste. However, it is possible to identify tasks that are carried out in many consultations, tasks that combined together can form any given consultation process.
  
 
We classified e-consultation technologies according to the type of communication process they support. We used that classification in our [http://wiki.e-consultation.org/TechDemo technology demonstrations] in Letterkenny and Belfast in 2005. Here follows an expanded classification. Click on the titles to find out more about each. They are organised according to typical stages of a problem-solving process<ref>As in [http://www.e-consultation.org/wikindx3/index.php?action=resourceView&id=145 Garrison's Theory of Critical Thinking]. Newman used these stages to (a) [http://www.e-consultation.org/wikindx3/index.php?action=resourceView&id=146 evaluate critical thinking] and (b) produce a [http://www.qub.ac.uk/mgt/papers/prefer/latrobe.html mediation model of consultation].</ref> (as found in some types of consultation).  
 
We classified e-consultation technologies according to the type of communication process they support. We used that classification in our [http://wiki.e-consultation.org/TechDemo technology demonstrations] in Letterkenny and Belfast in 2005. Here follows an expanded classification. Click on the titles to find out more about each. They are organised according to typical stages of a problem-solving process<ref>As in [http://www.e-consultation.org/wikindx3/index.php?action=resourceView&id=145 Garrison's Theory of Critical Thinking]. Newman used these stages to (a) [http://www.e-consultation.org/wikindx3/index.php?action=resourceView&id=146 evaluate critical thinking] and (b) produce a [http://www.qub.ac.uk/mgt/papers/prefer/latrobe.html mediation model of consultation].</ref> (as found in some types of consultation).  
  
In other types of consultation, these communication activities may be ordered differently. You can design a consultation process that is task specific, to meet the specific needs of the consultation topic, the consulting organisation and the participants (both for a coonsultation and the management of ongoing relationships between consulting organisations and those consulted.
+
In other types of consultation, these communication activities may be ordered differently. You can design a consultation process that is task specific, to meet the specific needs of the consultation topic, the consulting organisation and the participants.<ref>Both for a particular consultation and the management of ongoing relationships between consulting organisations and those consulted</ref>
  
===[[Defining the problem]]===
+
==[[Defining the problem]]==
  
 
Exactly what is the problem or issue to be discussed in a consultation? Can all the participants and the organisers come to a mutual agreement on what is involved? If not, they will be talking at cross-purposes, and no one will be satisfied with the outcome.
 
Exactly what is the problem or issue to be discussed in a consultation? Can all the participants and the organisers come to a mutual agreement on what is involved? If not, they will be talking at cross-purposes, and no one will be satisfied with the outcome.
  
#Telling the public
+
#[[Telling the public]]
#Identifying issues, collecting stories
+
#[[Identifying issues]], collecting stories
  
What issues concern participants? What problems should the consulting body be looking at? What can we learn from participants experiences? These are questions often asked at some stage during a consultation (often, but not always, at the beginning). There are technologies to help collect these stories and issues, from e-mail addresses for complaints and compliments to story-telling blogs.
+
==[[Exploring the problem]]==
 
 
===Exploring the problem===
 
  
 
Given an agreed problem definition, participants can then start to explore the problem. They need the ability to see to heart of problem based on deep understanding of situation. As a group they can explore new ideas, develop new solutions, understand issues, disentangle ideas and so on.
 
Given an agreed problem definition, participants can then start to explore the problem. They need the ability to see to heart of problem based on deep understanding of situation. As a group they can explore new ideas, develop new solutions, understand issues, disentangle ideas and so on.
  
====Getting reactions, feelings, new ideas====
+
#[[Getting reactions]], feelings, new ideas
 +
#[[Deliberation]], dialogue and conversations
 +
#[[Mapping ideas]]
  
To get spontaneity, people need to interact in real time, in face-to-face encounters, video or audio conferences, chat rooms and elsewhere.
+
==[[Choosing and developing solutions]]==
 
 
====Deliberation, dialogue and conversations====
 
 
 
For more subtle, and less rushed deliberation, arrange ongoing discussions, rather than quick chats. Any technology that facilitates a relay of responses or conversations can be used. Dialogue can be public—in an open environment with multiple participants—or private—between two users. Many discussion forums include both, allowing participants to converse with each other outside the general discussion.
 
 
 
====Mapping ideas====
 
 
 
Where consultation participants work together to explore the ramifications of a problem, and plan alternative solutions (e.g. in a citizens' jury). Technologies supporting this task may facilitate brainstorming, a technique groups use to generate ideas on a particular subject. Whereby, each person in the team is asked to think creatively and write down as many ideas as possible. The ideas are not discussed or reviewed until after the brainstorming session. From the results of the brainstorming, options are formulated which are then ranked or rated.
 
 
 
===Choosing and developing solutions===
 
  
 
Once participants have explored the problem, potential solutions, and their intended and unintended consequences, they need to choose, develop and write up the best solutions.
 
Once participants have explored the problem, potential solutions, and their intended and unintended consequences, they need to choose, develop and write up the best solutions.
  
====Creating solutions, writing reports====
+
#Creating solutions, [[writing documents]]
 
+
#[[Measuring needs and preferences]]
Consultees collaborating to write and edit documents.
 
 
 
====Measuring needs and preferences====
 
 
 
Finding out how many citizens have which needs, and what their preferences are between alternative options (e.g. through surveys, opinion polls, preferenda).
 
  
===Co-ordinating and managing the consultation process===
+
==[[Managing the consultation process]]==
  
 
This is not a communication activity, but every consultation has to be managed, and some IT can help.
 
This is not a communication activity, but every consultation has to be managed, and some IT can help.
 +
#[[Managing contacts]]
 +
#[[Analysing responses]]
 +
#[[Writing documents|Writing reports]]
  
 +
----
 +
'''Notes'''
 
<references/>
 
<references/>

Latest revision as of 11:35, 9 July 2006

Each consultation is different. There are many patterns of consultation. An annual survey of the needs of people in a local authority area is different from a consultation on how to dispose of nuclear waste. However, it is possible to identify tasks that are carried out in many consultations, tasks that combined together can form any given consultation process.

We classified e-consultation technologies according to the type of communication process they support. We used that classification in our technology demonstrations in Letterkenny and Belfast in 2005. Here follows an expanded classification. Click on the titles to find out more about each. They are organised according to typical stages of a problem-solving process[1] (as found in some types of consultation).

In other types of consultation, these communication activities may be ordered differently. You can design a consultation process that is task specific, to meet the specific needs of the consultation topic, the consulting organisation and the participants.[2]

Defining the problem

Exactly what is the problem or issue to be discussed in a consultation? Can all the participants and the organisers come to a mutual agreement on what is involved? If not, they will be talking at cross-purposes, and no one will be satisfied with the outcome.

  1. Telling the public
  2. Identifying issues, collecting stories

Exploring the problem

Given an agreed problem definition, participants can then start to explore the problem. They need the ability to see to heart of problem based on deep understanding of situation. As a group they can explore new ideas, develop new solutions, understand issues, disentangle ideas and so on.

  1. Getting reactions, feelings, new ideas
  2. Deliberation, dialogue and conversations
  3. Mapping ideas

Choosing and developing solutions

Once participants have explored the problem, potential solutions, and their intended and unintended consequences, they need to choose, develop and write up the best solutions.

  1. Creating solutions, writing documents
  2. Measuring needs and preferences

Managing the consultation process

This is not a communication activity, but every consultation has to be managed, and some IT can help.

  1. Managing contacts
  2. Analysing responses
  3. Writing reports

Notes

  1. As in Garrison's Theory of Critical Thinking. Newman used these stages to (a) evaluate critical thinking and (b) produce a mediation model of consultation.
  2. Both for a particular consultation and the management of ongoing relationships between consulting organisations and those consulted